Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1000MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +72%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265X OEM
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
20
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Curacao
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy