Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 160% (2600MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +680%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
48
2048
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 32
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy