Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 350X OEM and a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 68W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1124MHz vs 1050MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350X OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +78%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GM107
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
68W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy