Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 640SP and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 640SP +89%
1.184 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Feb 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
6
640
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Turks
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy