Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM
2.368 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +59%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
32
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
Tonga
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy