Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265X OEM +5971%
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Curacao
-
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy