Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1050MHz vs 925MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +17%
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
12
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tobago
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy