AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (115W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
18560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+4046%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
19456
56
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Bonaire XTX
(215-0839097)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
153 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
N/A
