AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (115W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+2%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1440
56
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
Cypress
Bonaire XTX
(215-0839097)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
