Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (115W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +440%
10.65 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
-
-
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
160 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net