Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X +221%
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
8
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Cayman
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

115W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy