Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +2953%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
56
Compute Units
4
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV730
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
48W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy