Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +14094%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
240
384
TMUs
40
192
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GF104
Navi 31
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy