Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 20 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1283MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (189.4GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 20 +312%
3.284 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

815 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1283 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
740 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
1024bit
Memory Bus
64bit
189.4GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

41.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
102.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
6.569 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
3.284 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
205.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 12
GPU Name
GP108B
Vega 12 XTA
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy