Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7300X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1243MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V7300X +501%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1188 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1243 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
8
2304
Shading Units
512
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy