Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV530
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy