Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Boost Clock1746MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229TB/s vs 1.02TB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI50
13.41 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +3%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
60
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
7680
240
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
8 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy