Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +206%
45.26 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
8192
832
TMUs
256
0
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
500W
900 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy