Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 +129%
1.229 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
Southern Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

85W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy