ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
+1531%
3.133 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV630 XT
(215CDABKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
