Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1500MHz vs 1400MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 384SP
1.152 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU +86%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
Renoir
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

400 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
36.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
2.304 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.301 TFLOPS
1152 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Renoir
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
-
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 12.2
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

15W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy