Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon RX 6300M

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon RX 6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (2400MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +58%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300M
3.686 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
Embedded
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
12
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
115.2 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.373 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.686 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 24
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XML
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy