AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA P106M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1291MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+96%
5.834 TFLOPS
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2019
Embedded
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
2304
Shading Units
1152
144
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GP106
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
