AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R7 A360
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1266MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+575%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A360
0.864 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
May 2015
Embedded
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
1100 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.000 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.00 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
864.0 GFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
864.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
54.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Meso
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Meso XT
(216-0864018)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
