Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 48 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1266MHz
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 48 +26%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Mar 2019
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
48
2304
Shading Units
3072
144
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Vega 10
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy