AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA T600 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1395MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+133%
5.834 TFLOPS
T600 Max Q
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU117
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
