AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2007
Embedded
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
M66
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
M66-P
(216BGCKC13FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
