AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1350MHz vs 1266MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 Max Q
+243%
20.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2023
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
795 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
58
2304
Shading Units
7424
144
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
313.2 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.04 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.04 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
313.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD104
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
GN21-X9
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
4 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
295 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
