Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro W6150M

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +253%
5.834 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Nov 2015
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
12
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Emerald
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy