AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9390 PCIe and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (2010MHz vs 1089MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9390 PCIe
3.903 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+216%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
713 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1792
Shading Units
3072
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
34.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
122.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
3.903 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
3.903 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
243.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
