Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD FirePro A300

AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 143% (2200MHz vs 905MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M +386%
3.379 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi II IGP
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
32 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy