Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 56.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 550
1.211 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +229%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
-
1183 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
56.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
32
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
37.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
1211 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1211 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
75.71 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Tahiti
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy