NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+6562%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro VX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
252.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
