Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +7%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
2688
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy