NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+1350%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
