NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+16518%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370M
0.022 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
