NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 132% (1785MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+2%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+55%
3220
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+51%
1426
Quadro K5200
941
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
