NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+7678%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
