NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+691%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
