NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID M40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+361%
3.656 TFLOPS
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
