NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1710MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
A10G
+849%
31.52 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro T2000 Max Q
463
A10G
+675%
3589
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
72
1024
Shading Units
9216
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
