NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1620MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+136%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+172%
3220
Quadro M2000M
1180
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+172%
1505
Quadro M2000M
552
Blender
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+250%
463
Quadro M2000M
132
OctaneBench
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+108%
71
Quadro M2000M
34
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
