NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+52%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
