Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q +340%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
576
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy