NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+540%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
24
896
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GT200B
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
