NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+4313%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
896
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
G84
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
