NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+303%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GK107
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
