Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1352%
14.93 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
448
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GF110
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
247W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy