NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1545MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
+30%
7.119 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 4000
+198%
7853
RTX A500 Embedded
2628
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
2048
144
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
64
36
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GA107S
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
