NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1545MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (160W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
+95%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
108
2304
Shading Units
6912
144
TMUs
432
64
ROPs
192
288
Tensor Cores
432
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GA100
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
